The Elephant in the Room

These days I am sure we are all paying attention to the nation’s recovery report card, the stock market’s daily mood swings, the price of gas, the staggering unemployment numbers, and oh yes, the foreclosure market that has been like a wild fire in the Southern California hills; it just keeps growing and spreading. The GDP appears strong at a fourth quarter annual growth rate of 5.7%, but home sales in December were down 7.6%. Does that make sense? Oh sure it does, because December is always a slow month for sales and there was that hiccup in the home buyer tax credit program. I’m not forgetting about unemployment, but why talk about it even though it is the biggest elephant in the room. Well, I guess we have to talk about it because our local flagship newspaper needs a sensational story to fill column inches.

Much to the displeasure of the real estate community, the Gazette once again decided to paint a most negative depressing picture about the real estate market, and the overall state of our union all in the name of truth penned by its resident editorial curmudgeon. The front page headline reads, “Foreclosures and Joblessness Up”. Sure we have about 24 bank owned properties in Dukes County that we are working to absorb, and there will surely be more on the way during this year. However, the writer insists on going on and on about the column inches all the foreclosures are taking up in print, and now we can put a number on unemployment predicting 50% over the next couple months, compared to about half that in normal times. With no new home starts, everyone counting pennies, only buying essentials and eating at home instead of going out to dinner, is this really breaking news?

The good news in this editorial according to Chris Wells, president of MV Savings Bank is petitions to foreclose are not nearly what they are in the rest of Southern New England and the median sale prices in some towns actually increased from 2008 to 2009. West Tisbury shows a 2% increase and Edgartown a 14% increase in median sales prices. According to Mr. Wells, in the other three Island towns, Oak Bluffs was down 27%, Tisbury was down 19% and Chilmark saw the greatest reduction at 43% median sales price.

Martha’s Vineyard continues to bravely soldier on, its citizens doing all they can to make ends meet and keep a stiff upper lip. We have always been a hot and cold running Island with jobs for everyone during the tourist season and one of the highest, if not the highest unemployment rates in the Commonwealth for what amounts to 8 months during the off season. The Island greeting has become variations of “we’re hanging in there” and assurances that “we are all in this together”. Whew, I feel better already. What we all look for every day is some good news, news that will inspire us to keep on because we know summer is coming and with the sun we look forward to greeting all those visitors who love what Martha’s Vineyard has to offer, a simpler way of life.  Oh by the way, bring your checkbook and support the Island economy.

Is Your Real Estate Agent a Spy?

Is your agent a spy? What kind of question is that; it's an important question spawned by the constant controversy and confusion about AGENCY. Who does an agent represent and how do they represent them? The answer to that question can mean thousands of dollars in or out of a buyer's pocket.

I try my best to illustrate the nuances and various types of Agency to consumers on my website, but no matter how I explain the differences, I find most people just don’t get it. However, I really don’t blame them because it is the real estate industry that prefers to keep the smoke screen smoldering to allow for maximum personal gain.

The organization I belong to, The National Association of Exclusive Buyer Agents (NAEBA), continues to lobby for a clearer definition or distinction and separation between those agents that proclaim loudly that they can represent buyers as exclusive buyer agents, yet under their breath slide in the disclaimer or, more appropriately, the caveat, “with the right to transition to dual agency”. That is where the true distinction lies and dual agency is the problem. Attorneys and those in the know think dual agency is a double standard and fertile ground for suspicion and potential favoritism ultimately resulting in litigation. Some states already prohibit the practice of dual agency.

I was reading an article in a trade news publication where a consumer was buying a home and wanted to know how the process would work if the home she was interested in was being offered by a real estate agent who would be working as what the buyer ironically called a “double” agent? In other words, working for both the buyer and the seller. What was really interesting was the choice of words since what she was talking about was a “dual” agent. Subconsciously, she viewed the agent as a double agent. The definition of double agent is “A person pretending to work as a spy for one government (company, etc.) while actually working as a spy for another government (company, etc.).

To pull this back into the real estate vernacular let’s look at this as what is called single-agent dual agency, that being a relationship where one agent represents (?) both the buyer and the seller in the same transaction. That agent can no longer offer the same fiduciary responsibilities to either party as if they were representing one exclusively. The dual agent cannot provide Undivided Loyalty. This is an important point because as a client fiduciary an agent representing a buyer or a seller exclusively is sworn to treat the client’s best interests above their own. Other obligations that cannot be met in a dual agency arrangement are Obedience, Reasonable Care and Diligence and Full Disclosure. The dual agent is required not to disclose any confidential information about both parties. But let me ask you this; in 99% of cases, who do you think the (seller) agent has had the longer term relationship with? You, the buyer or the seller they have the listing agreement with? As a buyer, did you tell your agent the maximum amount you are willing to pay for the property or any other tidbits you would not want to the seller to know about you? Do you think the seller told their agent what their bottom line is or why they are selling? If the agent divulges any of that privileged confidential information without authorization, it is an actionable offense. There is one important point to note and that is that you as a buyer have the right to say no to dual agency when signing an exclusive buyer agency agreement, but that means your buyer agent cannot show you properties listed by their broker agency. The same holds true for a seller.

Most people entering into the Martha’s Vineyard real estate market do not live here and are usually from another part of the country. They know nothing about this market and if they are wise they realize they will need help, not just with looking for the right property or formulating a negotiation strategy, but most importantly with all the due diligence that is essential between the Offer to Purchase and the day of Closing. They need to be exclusively represented 100% of the time.

NAEBA continues to advocate for a clearer explanation of the differences so the public can be better protected. I was speaking to a web advertising sales representative yesterday and asked him why they cannot change the category headings in the real estate agency listing section to read SELLER AGENCIES and BUYER AGENCIES, instead of SALES AGENCIES and BUYER AGENCIES. Wouldn’t that make a little more sense? I doubt we will ever see two distinct categories --- BUYER AGENCIES and EXCLUSIVELY BUYER AGENCIES, because the National Association of REALTORS® continues to allow for the oxymoron labeled as Exclusive Buyer Representation with the right to transition to Dual Agency, but Brokers who believe in my business model will continue to educate the public about the advantages of being represented “Exclusively”.

HouseLogic.com - A Great New Educational Web Site

I am a REALTOR® which means I belong to the world’s largest professional association with 1.1 million members. The National Association of REALTORS® or NAR has become one of the most powerful lobbying groups in the nation since its inception in 1908.

Most consumers do not understand what NAR does and probably think it is self-serving and has no relevance for them. NAR cares about the homeowner as well as those dreaming of becoming homeowners. That is why it enforces a strict Code of Ethics for its members. However, that is not all.

In an effort to bring better understanding for the real estate profession NAR has launched a new educational website, currently in beta format, that is aimed at engaging as many of the 75 million homeowner households as possible even if they are not currently in the market. HouseLogic.com is not merely another marketing channel for REALTORS®; it is focused on becoming an informational mecca for consumers providing useful tips, hints and articles, aimed at motivating homeowners to take more interest in their homes, more interest in maintaining and improving the value of their homes, and ultimately more interest in taking political action that supports home valuations, home sales and homeownership. If successful, with the voice and concern of the nation’s homeowners behind it, NAR would become an invincible force at practically all levels of government advocating for homeowners and the REALTORS® serving them.

Take a cruise through www.HouseLogic.com and see what you think. Knowledge is Power and SplitRock Real Estate creates Power Buyers.

President Obama’s NEW Housing-Aid Plan – who WINS and who LOSES?

The new Housing-Aid Plan, according to the administration, is estimated to cover as many as nine million mortgage holders nationwide. It has two main components.

PART 1: Loan Modification
The first part supports borrowers who have kept up with their mortgage payments, but have lost so much value in their homes that they don’t have the equity necessary to refinance. Therefore, they are unable to take advantage of the present record low interest rates, which are hovering around 4%.

You WIN if you have payments of more than 31% of your pretax monthly income and you can prove hardship.

You WIN if you occupy a single-family home and can prove the home is your primary residence.

You WIN if you have an unpaid principal balance of $729,750 or less.

You WIN if you have a mortgage originated on or before January 1, 2009 and make all the modified payments over a trial period of three months or more.

You LOSE if you are not about to default.

You LOSE if you are an investor with a home that is not owner-occupied.

You LOSE if you have a home that is vacant of condemned.

You LOSE if you have an unpaid principal of more than $729,750.

You LOSE if your mortgage is packaged into securities whose rules explicitly forbid modification.

You LOSE if you have loan servicers who can’t be reached or are unwilling to consider modification.

PART 2: Loan Refinancing
The second part of the plan is geared toward borrowers who are already delinquent in their loan payments or are in eminent danger of default and aren’t able to refinance, perhaps due to a decrease in the value of their home.

You WIN if you have loans owned or guaranteed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.

You WIN if you are current on your mortgage payments.

You WIN if you can prove the ability to afford the new mortgage debt.

You WIN if your mortgage balance is no more than 105% of your current estimated home value.

You LOSE if you have loans owned or guaranteed by a company other than Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.

You LOSE if you have been more than 30 days late on a payment in the past 12 months.

You LOSE if you can’t afford the new mortgage debt.

You LOSE if your home price has fallen so that the loan is more than 105% of the market price.

Everything is Coming Up Roses, Or Are They Tea Bags?

Rick Santelli was reporting from the pit at the Chicago stock exchange the other day and got everyone stirred up with his suggestion of a Chicago Tea Party . I thought it was marvelous and right on.

Here we are now with a $787 billion stimulus package that includes anemic elements like an $8000.00 tax credit for taxpayers buying a primary residence between Jan. 1 and Dec. 1, 2009. Single taxpayers making less than $75,000 are eligible. That tax credit doubles for married couples. Think about it, an 8k credit is just a drop in the bucket for a buyer in areas like Martha’s Vineyard, and no not everyone who lives here is rich. It’s just not enough. And what about the $75 billion mortgage relief plan the President announced. It’s not right. The Wall Street Journal says, "By investing in failure, the Administration will also prolong the housing downturn and make financing a home purchase more difficult for future borrowers." The New York Times says it is "a good start, but given the dire state of the economy, we fear it still may not be enough."

But what is enough and actually too much is the idea that people who did nothing wrong, the 92 percentile, are being asked to help the 8% that either had no business getting a loan in the first place or defrauded the banks intentionally out of sheer avarice. It’s the hard working people who are continuing to pay their bills even though they are suffering like everyone else today; they are really going to suffer.

Here’s a quick story I heard yesterday from a broker in Florida about one of those people you will be suffering for. This ‘investor’ accumulated no less than 20 properties through no-money down financing during the high time of the market. They did not and have not paid one cent toward an equity share on those properties; they had every intention of not owning the properties long term. The lenders began the foreclosure process about three years ago, but it takes time. In the meantime, this person is consistently making about $20,000 a month in rental income. There are hundreds of scenarios like this one. Why should we suffer for this kind of behavior? They should lose everything and go to jail. But if they go to jail, shouldn’t the enablers go with them? Yes, and that is why nothing will happen to them.

If you are wondering why the foreclosure machine is moving so slowly, let me give you a brief idea by way of another true story. This person is a first time home buyer who will most likely lose their home when their Alt-A loan resets. Mind you this is also in one of the areas where values have dropped by 50%. This person went through foreclosure prevention counseling and as instructed began the bureaucratic procedure with the lender for a loan modification. They spoke to a loss mitigation representative and complied with the instructions they were given. They supplied all the necessary documentation, both on line and via certified mail. They had the person’s name and extension number, but when they called to get a progress report after about two weeks, that person did not exist and both their cyber and paper trail no longer existed. They tried again filling out all the same information, etc. Again after a couple of weeks they contacted the LM department and that person did not exist. However, somehow they were finally able to track down the person that helped them. The representative told them, “You can jump up and down, get nasty and impatient but it will not do you any good. I have over 100 case files on my desk and you are just one of them in the pile. You’ll hear from us when we get to your case.” End of discussion. That’s just one person who has to deal with this enormous mess the government wants everyone to be responsible for.

Bringing it back home to the Cape and Martha’s Vineyard, here in Massachusetts the Warren Group reported the number of homes on Cape Cod that were actually foreclosed on last month was down 8.9 percent. This number is compared to January 2008. In exact numbers, there were 41 foreclosure deeds filed in January 2009 compared to 45 last year. In Dukes County, which is Martha’s Vineyard, the number of foreclosure deeds filed fell to 9 last month compared to 13 in January 2008. That is a difference of 30.8 percent. The experts are not sure what is causing this reduction in foreclosures, but it is a good sign as are the more realistic price reductions posted by the Martha’s Vineyard Information Network database. There are 467 single family homes currently on the market with a total inventory of 680 properties in all classifications. There are 72 single family homes that have been removed from the market since the first of the year. I can assure you everything is for sale, so if you want one of those properties just ask.

WHAT’S “WRONG” WITH THE MARTHA’S VINEYARD REAL ESTATE MARKET

Starting with the premise that commerce is activated by supply and demand, I want to look at what is wrong with the Martha’s Vineyard real estate market today. What I discovered was that, in fact, there is nothing wrong with the Martha’s Vineyard real estate market; it is just that this market is confusing to many people and even more confusing today given the dire conditions in the financial market and a disparity in seller motivation factors. But first let me establish a few facts as guidelines:
<> This is not a place people have to be, they want to be here. Martha’s Vineyard is a destination and for the most part, a second home market.
<> This Island is only 20.5 miles long, 87.48 square miles in total land area --- they are not making any more of Martha’s Vineyard.
<> With home prices averaging almost 100% higher than the national average, ranging from $300,000 for a shabby ‘fixer-upper’ to $25,000,000 and above not everyone can afford to swallow that pill.
<> The cost of living is about 60% above the mean, so once again living here is surely not for everyone, but that does not diminish its popularity.
<> There are between 775 and 850 properties on the market, depending upon the method of tabulation used, which is about four times as many properties as there were at the height of the market.
<> The current inventory is about one-quarter of what we had to deal with after the market broke in 1988, and the population density has increased significantly since 1990.

The total inventory at the time of this writing totals 777 properties. I want to break down that number, which includes all classifications of properties so you have a better perspective:
<> Up to $200,000 = 7 properties (Note: This includes a share in a fishing camp, an aircraft hanger, time shares and an office condo.)
<> $201,000 - $400,000 = 86 properties
<> $401,000 - $600,000 = 162 properties
<> $601,000 - $800,000 = 140 properties
<> $801,000 - $1,000,000 = 85 properties
<> $1,100,000 - $2,000,000 = 157 properties
<> $2,100,000 - $3,000,000 = 51 properties
<> $3,100,000 - $5,000,000 = 54 properties
<> $5,100,000 – $30,000,000 = 35 properties

Only 18% of the inventory is above $2,000,000. That means the so-called lower end of the market is where the fat is. However, within that segment lies a misleading inflationary factor --- sellers who do not have to sell.

For a few years now we have been reading about how the real estate market has tanked in some areas of the country, falling into what many view as a fathomless abyss. The media has us believing this was the general condition everywhere. In an attempt to educate consumers, the National Association of Realtors® launched an educational campaign proclaiming ‘all real estate is local’. This is true, all real estate is local and in many parts of the country the market has been pretty much stable or a recovery is under way. But the message came too late, the die was cast, and for most of the country sales activity started to stall. Sellers started to panic and buyers delighted that the tide was turning in their favor. No longer would the buyers be at the mercy of a seller’s market. Even on Martha’s Vineyard buyers believed they finally had a chance to get a foothold on their dream Island.

Overall, however, property values still remain solid on Martha’s Vineyard. Yes, I am serious. If you are interested in real estate on Martha’s Vineyard, you should be paying attention to this local market and not be influenced by broad brush studies that are based on limited national metropolitan samplings. I don’t deny there are pockets across the country where prices have fallen 40% or more. These areas are not the norm. On Martha’s Vineyard, overall, the price drop has only gone down about 14% since 2006. For anyone who invested in Martha’s Vineyard real estate 5, 10, or 20 years ago, the good news is their investment has increased handsomely in value over that time period, even with the occasional bumps in the economic highway.

Exclusive Buyer Agents, such as SplitRock Real Estate, work very hard to educate consumers and create Power Buyers. I have a number of buyer/clients who have been working with me for 6 months, a year, even three years or more. They have a sincere desire to be here if they can only find the right property at the right price (Isn’t that typical of what motivates buying decisions?). Much to their chagrin they are discovering that prices on the Vineyard make no sense. Comparables are difficult to come up with, and ultimately the buying decision has to be an emotional decision. For those who are thinking long term and understand the fundamentals of real estate investment, the fact that prices overall have not gone down much should be a reassuring factor that lends more confidence to a buying decision. For others, if they cannot afford to make the investment now they will regrettably join the ranks of the would-have, should-have, could-have buyers.

So what is wrong with the Martha’s Vineyard real estate market? Buyers who enter the Martha’s Vineyard real estate market, regardless of whether it is an up or a down market are confused and scared. They do not want to make a mistake or appear foolish. There are many sellers who are sincerely motivated and will actively compete, engage and negotiate with buyers to sell their properties in this market. I am not including what we call distress sales, i.e. short sales, foreclosures and bank owned properties (aka REO’s). The problem lies with the ‘ego seller’ who lists their property for sale, but really does not care if they sell now or two years from now. They are not willing to listen to the market (IE their seller agents), and insist on holding a hard line because they think their properties are special, and their posture is "I don't have to sell". I call this the ‘goose that laid the golden egg’ mentality. Sellers who are not competitive are like buyers who are not qualified; they are wasting everyone’s time and money. If you are a serious seller, please don’t be offended by an offer you receive. Be willing to graciously engage with a meaningful counter offer. Properly educating buyers is a difficult, time-consuming process. When they get to a point where they are comfortable making a reasonable offer, if they are coldly rejected by a seller, it sets the whole process back considerably. If you recall the moral of Aesop’s fable, he who wants too much loses everything. In this case it is the entire Vineyard real estate market that is losing.

As average buyers watch the market week after week, the inventory continues to grow. Some buyers hold out, sitting on the sidelines, as they keep hoping those overpriced properties will come down in price. They resist making a buying decision waiting for sellers to cave in. The result is a slow market with minimal inventory absorption. When the inventory was limited, the demand was greater and the market moved briskly. If this market is going to get back in stride, it is my opinion that sellers, who don’t need to sell, should remove their properties from the current inventory. If sellers don’t like where the market is today and they are not willing to be competitive and engage in negotiations, they should wait and relist their properties when happy days are here again. And surely, this too shall pass and happy days will return.

A Cautionary To Homeowners - Reverse Mortgages

This article appeared in today's Wall Street Journal. I have always believed that Reverse Mortgages can be a trap unless they are structured properly and are carefully thought through by the homeowner.

By Donna Kardos
The Wall Street Journal Online

"The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority urged homeowners over the age of 60 to carefully weigh their options before tapping into their home equity through reverse mortgages to obtain additional income for their retirement years.

"The group, formed by a merger of the NASD and some regulatory functions of New York Stock Exchange parent NYSE Group Inc., warned that a reverse mortgage -- an interest-bearing loan secured by the equity in a home -- can jeopardize their financial futures.

"With a reverse mortgage, a bank makes payments to a homeowner instead of the homeowner making payments to a bank. The loan is repaid, with interest, when the borrower sells the house, moves out or dies. Reverse mortgages have high fees -- typically about 7% of the home's value -- and they make it difficult for homeowners to leave the property to their heirs.

"The warning notes that, in some cases, those who sell the mortgages may profit from the their sale, giving them twice the incentive to talk someone into a loan they may not need.

"Finra Chief Executive Mary L. Schapiro said home equity "is often a homeowner's most valuable asset and most precious source of retirement security." Accordingly, the agency reminded homeowners that reverse mortgages should generally be a last resort.

"Reverse mortgages were originally designed as a tool for aging, low-income homeowners to keep their homes, Finra said. But they have been used more often by retiring Americans as a way to finance a more-extravagant retirement lifestyle than they could otherwise afford.

"Still, as foreclosure rates continue to rise amid the subprime-mortgage crisis, some homeowners who have built up equity in their home may consider reverse mortgages their best option against losing it."

Related Article Reverse Mortgages: A Way Out Of a Bind for Older Homeowners

Martha’s Vineyard Real Estate – Should You Be In The Market Now?

There are too many people who should not be in the real estate market right now, both buyers and sellers. They’re not serious, they are time wasters, and to me real estate is not a game.

If I were a seller’s agent, and I am not, and a home owner came to me asking me to list his property at a certain price that was out of line with my market research, and saying “let’s just try it for a while at this price”, I would say no thank you. Perhaps that seller is unable to sell his property at fair market value because he owes too much, and is upside down --- loan vs. current market. Perhaps that seller does not have to sell, but is just testing the waters or derives some pleasure at seeing his property advertised at a big number. It is sellers like this and the resulting skewed values and distorted inventory that create the negative public opinion and add to buyer’s misperceived impression of the market.

If a buyer came to me, and they do, saying they want to “steal a property”, I say no thank you. Pricing property is analogous to water seeking its own level. If you price a property too high, it will languish on the market until the price comes in line with the market. Across the country, 36% of all properties sold for list price or higher. Only 12% of all properties nationally sold for 90% or less than asking price. What this means is buyers continue to wait until properties are priced correctly. If you recognize that a property is priced correctly, you need to bid accordingly because properties that are priced correctly will normally sell quickly to a savvy buyer, and there may be more than one savvy buyer making a run on a property at the same time. Buyers must realize right now prices are good, interest rates are excellent and anyone with cash or excellent credit has power if they use it wisely in their negotiation. I’ve seen this too many times. Buyers who are eager and ready to get into the market, but continue to sit on the sidelines waiting for the ‘go signal’ from on high that prices have bottomed out are destined to join the ‘would have … should have’ club. You know who I am talking about, those people who painfully recount that they could have bought that property for ….

In the investment game, if you think you are at the bottom, or at the top, it is too late --- you are already on the other side. Right now is a great time to approach the market because the fruit on the tree is abundant and ripe. I don’t blame anyone for having doubts and fears; after all, the news these days is mostly negative and full of fear. I love what Louis Rukeyser once said about investing, no matter what you do, it is going to be wrong so do something, because the worst thing is to do nothing.

We need to remember real estate is cyclical and this too shall pass. Historically, the down-markets normally last two to three years and the up-markets last from seven to ten years. I believe we are walking in the valley right now, but we just don’t know it. It is going to be a long slow trek through the valley and we may not reach the mountain until the end of 2008, or the beginning of 2009, but we are on the march. One thing is for sure, real estate values overall continue to go up. Real estate is the one sure investment that always appreciates over time.

Relief in Sight for Some Massachusetts Home Owners

You've all read countless articles and tales of woe and devestation caused by the subprime mortgage market debacle. The predatory behavior of many mortgage companies coupled by the lack of understanding of borrowers who either did not fully understand what they were getting into or were sold a bill of goods by the lenders has wiped out many homeowners.

In Massachusetts alone there are 24,650 adjustable rate mortgages due to reset at the beginning of 2008. However, there appears to be good news on the horizon for some > Subprime mortgage rates could be frozen for some .

In addition, an Associated Press release just reported that Governor Deval Patrick has signed a measure seeking to slow the state's recent spike in home foreclosures. According to the Governor, the new law gives Massachusetts one of the nation's most consumer-friendly mortgage lending statutes. The legislation requires mortgage companies to file a 90-day notice of intent to foreclose with the homeowner and the state. Borrowers would be required to receive consumer counseling before obtaining certain high-cost mortgages. Grants totaling $2 million would establish 10 education centers statewide and promote first-time home buyer and foreclosure counseling. (AP)

What is it going to take to get the Martha’s Vineyard real estate market rolling again?

There is one thing for sure, wishful thinking is not working. Neither is the constant stream of anemic price reductions week after week. How about those incentives and broker bonuses? You know what I'm talking about; the three-year old Range Rover in the driveway, the 24' sailboat, a 60" LCD TV, seller paid closing costs, seller paid Land Bank fee, first payment in six months, a vacation in the Bahamas or $50,000 to the agent that brings the buyer. None of that is working, and any additional compensation offered to an agent that brings the buyer should be considered a conflict of interest and bribery.

So what is working, and how is it working? Home "Staging" is working to some degree, but once buyers wise up to the fact that this kind of eye candy emotional sizzle is costing them thousands of dollars more in the price for the home, they will stop falling for it and start backing away from homes that look just too pretty. They will wonder what lies beneath the dining room table that is set for a 5-course formal dinner party seating twelve.

In an article written for Bloomberg News, John F. Wasik says, "Buyers just want price," he quotes one real-estate attorney/broker/consultant based in Stuart, Fla., as saying. "Buyers have become more educated and they can easily cut through the fluffy incentives". Hmmm. I don't think we're there yet. Everyone loves romance and people shopping for a home on Martha's Vineyard want to fall in love. This market is like going to Las Vegas for the first time and getting lost in one of the Casinos. Know the feeling?

What is the first question buyers ask? "How long has the house been on the market?" This has almost become a joke among real estate professionals, but buyers ask the question because it is commonly assumed that the longer a property has been on the market the weaker the seller's resolve to hold firm on price. You see, overpriced listings that languish on the market reduce the seller's negotiating ability as time diminishes their power. Once a listing has gone unsold, even if they take it off the market for a while or remove it and relist it with another agency, the information is in the public domain. There are definitely exceptions; EG: the seller doesn't have to sell, or the seller just likes to see their property advertized at some inflated price.

I think it is obvious that if a seller is serious --- I am NOT talking about desperate; homes priced to sell will sell. That means being ahead of the market instead of chasing the market. A good deal starts to get noticed if it is at least 10% below its competition. But when you see a good deal, do you think you are the only one who sees that good deal? Heck no, and usually you end up competing with other consumers who want what you want. What that can do is create a bidding war, and that is exactly what the seller wants --- or should want. A bidding war is probably the best and truest way to establish market value. I hate bidding wars, and right now I don't have to worry about it because sellers on Martha's Vineyard are following the same bloodletting technique; they all price high and week after week pull a few thousand dollars out of their last price. My clients feel like they are standing around the markdown sale table at Macy's waiting for the 70% off sign to go up.

There is a lot of misleading statistical information out there right now. Many agents talk about price-to-price ratio. In the recent 2007 NAR Report on Buyers and Sellers it states that "sellers sold their homes for 97% of list price." Does this mean 97% of the original listing price or 97% of the current listing price? The property could have been on the market for a year and transitioned through a half-dozen price reductions before it finally sold.

To sellers my advice is to listen to your listing broker when they give you an 'honest' price recommendation. In this market, if you interview several brokers, hire the broker who gives you the lowest price recommendation because they are probably the one telling you the truth. Many times a broker will agree to a listing contract with a seller because they are thinking, "If I don't take it, my competitor will and I will lose it." They know full well the property will never sell at the listing price. They are banking on the seller eventually coming to their senses and seeing the light. The conversation goes like this. "Mr. Seller, it has been three weeks since we listed your property and we have had no interest, so it is time to reduce the price." By then it is too late and that conversation will most certainly be had again --- and again.

To my buyer clients I always say if you like a property, pay little attention to the asking price and don't be afraid to make a "Bold Offer". By this I mean make an intelligent well thought-out and thoroughly researched offer. I make it perfectly clear on my website > ATTENTION SELLERS: A Low Offer Today, May be a High Offer in 60 Days .

What Consumers Want On A Real Estate Website

What information do most consumers want to know about when visiting a real estate website?

According to a survey released by the exclusive Buyer agency firm Accent Realty Group, here are the topics most searched by consumers:
1) 85.7% wanted the ability to search all homes in the area.
2) 42.9% said they wanted to know about local schools.
3) 57.1% said they wanted to know about local crime rates.
4) 28.6% said they wanted to know about tax rates.

The survey also went on to add the fact that consumers were still unfamiliar and confused about the terms “Dual Agency” and “Facilitator”.

I spent a lot of time personally creating my website and I go into great detail to educate consumers about the different types of Agency, but I still find about 50% of the potential buyers I speak with are confused or just plain suspicious. I don’t blame them because the real estate community is still playing a shell game and trying to be all things to all people. I say it can’t be done.

On my website I use the analogy of two sports teams sharing the same locker room, and the same coach. What kind of game do you think they are going to be playing? In an NAR sanctioned publication titled Agency – Choices, Challenges & Opportunities (Agent’s Guide), the definition of an EXCLUSIVE Buyer Agency reads as follows: “The practice of representing only buyers and never sellers in a transaction. The company never lists a sellers’ property and thus never has a seller as a client. Agents never accept subagency that is offered to a seller’s agent.” (Note: In Massachusetts, practically all agencies no longer offer compensation to subagents because of inherent liability.)

As if it is not hard enough for the public to understand terms like “Dual Agency”, “Designated Agency”, “Transaction Agency” or “Facilitator”, “Single Agency”, and “Buyer Agency -- with consent to Dual Agency”, many brokers are still misusing the term EXCLUSIVE in order to capture a buyer. They offer EXCLUSIVE Buyer Agency with consent to Dual Agency”. That is like saying, I’ll be married to you, but if I see someone I want to fool around with, I’ll do it. I don’t know about you, but my wife would have none of that and I am perfectly happy being her EXCLUSIVE husband. Call me what ever you like, but I prefer to keep my life simple stupid, and be respectful of consumer intelligence. I will never share the locker room with another team.

In conclusion, allow me to direct you to a wonderful article I just read and please call me if you still don’t “get it”. I create power buyers!

Follow this link to read > What Buyers Do Wrong