Monday, January 25, 2010

The Nationwide Mortgage Licensing System and Registry launches NMLS Consumer Access Website

The Office of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation announced that the Nationwide Mortgage Licensing System and Registry (NMLS), a mortgage licensing system operated by state financial regulators including the Massachusetts Division of Banks, launched the “NMLS Consumer Access”. There hope is that it will help protect mortgage shoppers from unscrupulous loan originators.

NMLS Consumer Access is a fully searchable single-source consumer access website that allows the public to verify state-licensed mortgage lenders, brokers and individuals currently licensed through NMLS. Future updates to NMLS Consumer Access will provide a record of applicable disciplinary actions taken against a licensee by any jurisdiction in the country.

The NMLS Consumer Access website was finally launched in January 2010 and the NMLS Resource Center, claims the website will bring greater transparency to the mortgage industry and compliance with provisions of the SAFE Act.

The database of companies and individuals will be updated nightly and will tell consumers whether the person they're working with has had their license suspended or revoked in another state, and will list any aliases the individual has used since the age of 18. It will also seek to discover whether that person is engaged in other sidelines and what that person’s license status is in other jurisdictions.

You can download a .PDF pamphlet of Information about NMLS Consumer Access prepared by the NMLS Resource Center.

Labels: , , , , ,

Sunday, January 24, 2010

Is Your Real Estate Agent a Spy?

Is your agent a spy? What kind of question is that; it's an important question spawned by the constant controversy and confusion about AGENCY. Who does an agent represent and how do they represent them? The answer to that question can mean thousands of dollars in or out of a buyer's pocket.

I try my best to illustrate the nuances and various types of Agency to consumers on my website, but no matter how I explain the differences, I find most people just don’t get it. However, I really don’t blame them because it is the real estate industry that prefers to keep the smoke screen smoldering to allow for maximum personal gain.

The organization I belong to, The National Association of Exclusive Buyer Agents (NAEBA), continues to lobby for a clearer definition or distinction and separation between those agents that proclaim loudly that they can represent buyers as exclusive buyer agents, yet under their breath slide in the disclaimer or, more appropriately, the caveat, “with the right to transition to dual agency”. That is where the true distinction lies and dual agency is the problem. Attorneys and those in the know think dual agency is a double standard and fertile ground for suspicion and potential favoritism ultimately resulting in litigation. Some states already prohibit the practice of dual agency.

I was reading an article in a trade news publication where a consumer was buying a home and wanted to know how the process would work if the home she was interested in was being offered by a real estate agent who would be working as what the buyer ironically called a “double” agent? In other words, working for both the buyer and the seller. What was really interesting was the choice of words since what she was talking about was a “dual” agent. Subconsciously, she viewed the agent as a double agent. The definition of double agent is “A person pretending to work as a spy for one government (company, etc.) while actually working as a spy for another government (company, etc.).

To pull this back into the real estate vernacular let’s look at this as what is called single-agent dual agency, that being a relationship where one agent represents (?) both the buyer and the seller in the same transaction. That agent can no longer offer the same fiduciary responsibilities to either party as if they were representing one exclusively. The dual agent cannot provide Undivided Loyalty. This is an important point because as a client fiduciary an agent representing a buyer or a seller exclusively is sworn to treat the client’s best interests above their own. Other obligations that cannot be met in a dual agency arrangement are Obedience, Reasonable Care and Diligence and Full Disclosure. The dual agent is required not to disclose any confidential information about both parties. But let me ask you this; in 99% of cases, who do you think the (seller) agent has had the longer term relationship with? You, the buyer or the seller they have the listing agreement with? As a buyer, did you tell your agent the maximum amount you are willing to pay for the property or any other tidbits you would not want to the seller to know about you? Do you think the seller told their agent what their bottom line is or why they are selling? If the agent divulges any of that privileged confidential information without authorization, it is an actionable offense. There is one important point to note and that is that you as a buyer have the right to say no to dual agency when signing an exclusive buyer agency agreement, but that means your buyer agent cannot show you properties listed by their broker agency. The same holds true for a seller.

Most people entering into the Martha’s Vineyard real estate market do not live here and are usually from another part of the country. They know nothing about this market and if they are wise they realize they will need help, not just with looking for the right property or formulating a negotiation strategy, but most importantly with all the due diligence that is essential between the Offer to Purchase and the day of Closing. They need to be exclusively represented 100% of the time.

NAEBA continues to advocate for a clearer explanation of the differences so the public can be better protected. I was speaking to a web advertising sales representative yesterday and asked him why they cannot change the category headings in the real estate agency listing section to read SELLER AGENCIES and BUYER AGENCIES, instead of SALES AGENCIES and BUYER AGENCIES. Wouldn’t that make a little more sense? I doubt we will ever see two distinct categories --- BUYER AGENCIES and EXCLUSIVELY BUYER AGENCIES, because the National Association of REALTORS® continues to allow for the oxymoron labeled as Exclusive Buyer Representation with the right to transition to Dual Agency, but Brokers who believe in my business model will continue to educate the public about the advantages of being represented “Exclusively”.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Saturday, January 02, 2010

Traditional Real Estate Agencies Rarely Sell Their Own Listings!

Did you know most listings are not sold by the agency representing the seller? The national average a number of years ago was around 13%. However, I was speaking to the principal broker of a large real estate agency not too long ago and she told me her company probably sells only about 5%-10% of their listings in-house. Isn’t that interesting?

I think this is actually a good thing for consumers and real estate professionals alike; it avoids a very precarious situation known as Dual Agency which means neither the buyer nor the seller are represented. The listing agency always represents the seller’s best interest and cannot assist a buyer unless unilateral consent to Dual Agency is given. Therefore, for those who think they can get a better deal by going directly to the listing agency, that is generally a false assumption. Undisclosed Dual Agency would be breaking the law. That is why buyers should find a buyer agent who knows what they are doing, has good relationships with seller agents and is a good negotiator.

Here on Martha's Vineyard, most seller agents realize their listings are overpriced, but they have to appease their seller clients who think they know better. The good-guy, bad-guy dynamic created by the separation between seller agent and exclusive buyer agent usually produces a much more advantageous outcome for all concerned. To be safe and have full access to all properties for sale, I suggest you always hire an EXCLUSIVE Buyer Agent. That way there can be no necessity for creating a Dual Agency relationship and the possible conflict of interest. To be blunt, you want SplitRock Real Estate on your side, and if you need representation in another part of Massachusetts or another part of the country, I will help you get the best exclusive buyer representation.

Labels: , , , , ,

Thursday, December 24, 2009

THERE IS A LOT OF UNCERTAINTY AS WE HEAD INTO 2010


Will we see more Foreclosures? Will we see more Short Sales? Will we see more Unemployment? Sadly, the answer to all these questions is yes. Most likely all of these events will once again push home prices down further. Here’s another question: will interest rates go up? Most analysts say yes; they will go up in 2010.

It’s clear that people are in the market now making purchases. They are taking advantage of the low – very low interest rates and the newly rewritten and extended first time home buyer tax credit. Many are using this new opportunity to trade up to the home of their dreams. But does this mean the market is recovering or do we have further to travel before we bottom out? I just don’t know.

Here's what HomeGain.com, a web marketing company that tracks the real estate market, has discovered in a recent survey.

62% of home BUYERS think homes on the market are overpriced.

76% of home OWNERS think their homes are worth more than their real estate agent recommends.

41% of home OWNERS think their homes’ listing price should be 10%-20% higher than their real estate agent recommends.

24% of real estate agents think home prices will go up in the next 6 months.

48% of real estate agents think home prices will remain flat in the next 6 months.

Note: NAR says 2mm people benefited from the first go-around of the tax credit. During this extension period of the Home Buyer Tax Credit, home owners who have been in their homes for 5 years can realize a tax credit deduction of up to $6,500 expansion, but they have to act soon.

Click here to read more > http://www.marealtor.com/content/Homebuyer_Tax_Credit.htm

What I do know is, as long as you have job stability, the monthly payments of your loan are affordable and not a stretch or based upon any projected rental income, and you are buying the home of your dreams that will make you happy for the long term, this is the time to buy. As I have said before, up or down, in ten years $10,000 to $20,000 will not matter, but don’t buy something just because the prices are attractive now – at least not on Martha’s Vineyard.

There are a number of properties on the market right now that appear to be very attractive buys. However, many of them are using an “As Is” caveat. That is because the seller usually does not have the funds to make any repairs that could possibly be discovered during a Structural Home Inspection. He is telling you the Buyer up front that no matter what the problem is; it is your problem. Your home inspector or your real estate agent may try to minimize the costs of the required repairs, but let me assure you nothing is inexpensive here on Martha’s Vineyard. Don’t romance yourself into false assumptions; have your buyer agent get you the facts. I do that for all my clients because I hate surprises.

So as this year skids to a close, let’s keep our eye on the prize, have a clear vision of what is important and move forward with intelligent thinking.

Labels: , , , , ,

If You Don't Buy a House Now, You're Stupid or Broke

Interest rates are at historic lows but cyclical trends suggest they will soon rise. Home buyers may never see such a chance again, writes Marc Roth for Business Week.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Let's Play What's My Market


I was reading an article the other day that posed an interesting question about the current market. What kind of market are we in, a Buyer’s Market or a Seller’s Market?

As you know, the definition of a Buyer’s Market is one where there are more properties on the market than there are buyers willing to buy them. When a buyer makes an offer on a property, and the seller does not accept the offer, the buyer is likely to end negotiations and move on to another property because the market is perceived to be the land of plenty.

Is that true now? Are you looking for a particular property or type of property? Are you finding an abundance of properties that fit your profile? If the answer is no, then this is not a Buyer’s Market for you.

Conversely, a Seller’s Market is one where there is a large audience of eager buyers and limited inventory, resulting in multiple offers and a frenzy that inevitably drives up the final sale price. Believe it or not, this is happening in many areas of the country like California. Is it happening on Martha’s Vineyard and what is your view of the Martha’s Vineyard real estate market?

My opinion is that we are in a market we have never seen before. This is a bipolar or, dare I even say, a psychotic market. This is a market where the banks, lenders and appraisers control and determine the value and the fate of the market. This is also a market that depending upon the price line, location or circumstance can be a seller’s market, a buyer’s market, a lien-holder’s market, a lender’s market (there is a difference) or an appraiser’s market. Another facet of this market is what we call shadow inventories. There is an inventory of properties that are not on the market but available for sale if and/or when the market appears stable enough for those silent sellers to get their price. The banks are also holding inventory they have reclaimed through foreclosure, not so much on the Vineyard at this time, but to a great extent in other areas of the country. They are holding them until they feel they have a better chance to recoup their loss. Many of those properties were originally part of the ‘short sale’ inventory.

It would seem with prices and interest rates at historically low numbers first-time home buyers and trade-up home buyers would be running into the market and into the grateful open arms of eager sellers anxious to make a deal. Buyers should realize what a once in a lifetime opportunity they have to purchase the home of their dreams at today’s dollars and historically low interest rates. However, there is a pervasive sense of entitlement on both sides in today’s market that is preventing buyers and sellers from coming together.

Okay, so what is the problem? Ironically, as I am writing, I got my answer in a response to a conversation I am having with a seller agent regarding a buyer client who is interested in a couple of her listings. She says, “… both are pretty motivated...but these are not distress sales. We'll obviously consider any offer.” Who would put their property on the market today if they are not ‘motivated’ to sell? Ignoring the market data, sellers believe they are entitled to higher prices for their homes, and buyers believe they are entitled to even further discounts on homes that have already been heavily discounted. So once again, just like when we were children at our first dance; buyers will sit on one side, sellers will sit on the other side, both acquisitively looking at each other and missing the ‘last dance’.

Labels: , , , , ,

Thursday, November 26, 2009

Where To Now Martha's Vineyard?

Are you upside down? Did you know one in four home owners in America with a mortgage are under water? By that I mean their home is worth less than what they owe. The beginning of 2010 will see more Option ARM’s coming to term. In many cases where home prices have fallen drastically borrowers are so deeply under water that they can't refinance their mortgage in order to take advantage of take advantage of the current lower rates. "We're declining hundreds of loans each month," said Steve Walsh, a mortgage broker in Scottsdale, Ariz. "The only way we will make headway is if we allow for a streamlined refinance where the appraisal is irrelevant."

5.3 million homeowners have mortgages that are at least 120% of their homes’ value. According to Mark Fleming, chief economist of First American Core Logic, homeowners whose loan to value ratio is greater than 120% are more likely to default and 520,000 of these borrowers have received default notices. Even if they want to sell (Short Sale), they can’t afford to --- they’re stuck. Sanjiv Das, head of Citigroup's mortgage unit said "Beyond 120%, the most effective modification is a complete loan restructuring, including a principal reduction. Mr. Das goes on to say “Borrowers who are less than 20% under water are likely to maintain their mortgage if their loan is modified and the payments reduced”.

As financial institutions continue to struggle with how they are going to solve the mess they have created, about 588,000 borrowers defaulted on mortgages last year even though they had employment and could afford to pay. That is more than double the number in 2007, according to a study by Experian and consulting firm Oliver Wyman. "The American consumer has had a long-held taboo against walking away from the home, and this crisis seems to be eroding that," the study said. Previously the advice to borrowers has been, only by defaulting on their loans will lenders pay attention and consider adjusting rates and principals in line with today’s market. However, lenders have been reluctant to reduce mortgage principal over worries about "moral contagion, with people not paying their mortgage or re-defaulting because they believed the bank would reduce their principal," Mr. Das said.

I expect that we will see more loan defaults on Martha’s Vineyard and more foreclosure auctions at the beginning of 2010 despite the fact that we have leveled out in our market. In the early 90’s we called this moment in the market a “trough”. I also think the Martha’s Vineyard recovery will slow down because; with the optimistic forecast more less-motivated homeowners have placed their properties back on the market at overly optimistic prices. I believe the result will be a stall in the market because everyone is confused. However, I still maintain that this is a great time to buy. Look at what you have going for you. Interest rates hit an all time record low this week averaging 4.78% on a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage --- this has never happened before in all the time Freddie Mac has been keeping records. For comparison sake, the interest rate last year was 5.97%. "Interest rates for 30-year fixed-rate loans are currently 0.8 percentage points below this year's peak set in mid-June, which shaves roughly $100 off the monthly payments on a $200,000 mortgage," said Frank Nothaft, Freddie Mac chief economist. Interest rates will only go in one direction from here, and don’t forget the extended and broadened home buyer tax credit; it no longer applies only to first time home buyers.

I want to urge you, if you see something you like take a run at it. You will never know what you can negotiate until you engage, but be patient, realistic and resolute in your objective. $20,000 one way or the other today is not going to make a difference ten years from now.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Saturday, November 07, 2009

Great News for Martha's Vineyard Home Buyers!

First-Time Home Buyer Tax Credit

President Obama signed the Homebuyer Tax Credit into law after overwhelming votes for it in Congress. The credit takes effect as of November 6, 2009. To be eligible, a purchase contract must be signed by April 30, 2010, and close on or before June 30, 2010. This is a very narrow window of opportunity so pay attention and don't miss out.

Not only is the existing $8,000 tax credit for first-time homebuyers extended but a new "Homebuyer Tax Credit" of up to $6,500 for some existing homeowners has been added. The reduced credit would be available to all homebuyers who have been in their current residence for a consecutive five-year period in the past eight years.

The qualifying income limits are being raised to $125,000 for single taxpayers and $250,000 for joint taxpayers, from the current $75,000 and $150,000.

Martha’s Vineyard Land Bank “M” Exemption

In an effort to stimulate home sales to first-time home buyers, the Martha’s Vineyard Land Bank has increased the credit amount of the “M” Exemption. The “M” Exemption is a credit given only to eligible first-time home buyers toward the Land Bank Fee of 2% of the purchase price of real estate on Martha’s Vineyard.

Prior to September 1, 2004, the “M” exemption was $100,000 and in order to qualify all parties on the deed may not have ever owned real property at any time, not just on Martha’s Vineyard but anywhere. Subsequently, it was increased to $300,000 and the exemption was available to first-time purchasers of real estate who will domicile on the property within two years and hold the property for at least five years from the date of transfer. In the case of spouses, either spouse can have owned or possessed an interest in real property prior to the time of purchase, but not both spouses. As of October 27, 2009, per a recent amendment to the land bank law, first time purchasers may now claim a $400,000 "M" exemption. All of the other requirements of the "M" exemption are unchanged.

Mortgage Interest Rates Remain Below 5%

Although inflation is an assumed and anticipated part of our future economic recovery, the Fed anticipating continued slow growth during the next few months voted the status quo for interest rates with their announcement this week that "economic conditions are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels of the federal funds rate for an extended period." Rates will stay where they are for now because the Federal Reserve group believes that even with economic growth ahead, it will be at a manageable pace.

On Martha’s Vineyard, for loans up to $417,000 you can get a 15-year fixed rate mortgage for 4.5%, with no points and a 30-year fixed with one point for 5.1%. 30-year loans are actually down by an eighth of a point at maturity.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Saturday, October 31, 2009

Martha's Vineyard First-Time Home Buyers See Continued Signs of Assistance and Relief

According to an article in the WSJ this week, the Senate has reached a compromise aimed at continuing assistance to first-time home buyers in the form of a tax credit. The agreement still has to pass the full Senate and the House but if it is approved it will extend the existing $8,000 tax credit for first-time homebuyers as well as add a new credit of up to $6,500 for some existing homeowners. The reduced credit would be available to all homebuyers who have been in their current residence for a consecutive five-year period in the past eight years.

Housing-industry sources in Washington are saying the qualifying income limits will be raised to $125,000 for single taxpayers and $250,000 for joint taxpayers, from the current $75,000 and $150,000. Should this new agreement become law, buyers must have executed sales agreements by April 30, and be able to close escrow by June 30, 2010.

On Martha’s Vineyard, in an effort to stimulate home sales to first-time home buyers, the Martha’s Vineyard Land Bank has increased the credit amount of the “M” Exemption. The “M” Exemption is a credit given only to eligible first-time home buyers toward the Land Bank Fee of 2% of the purchase price of real estate on Martha’s Vineyard.

Prior to September 1, 2004, the “M” exemption was $100,000 and in order to qualify all parties on the deed may not have ever owned real property at any time, not just on Martha’s Vineyard but anywhere. Subsequently, it was increased to $300,000 and the exemption was available to first-time purchasers of real estate who will domicile on the property within two years and hold the property for at least five years from the date of transfer. In the case of spouses, either spouse can have owned or possessed an interest in real property prior to the time of purchase, but not both spouses. As of October 27, 2009, per a recent amendment to the land bank law, first time purchasers may now claim a $400,000 "M" exemption. All of the other requirements of the "M" exemption are unchanged.

To learn more about the Martha’s Vineyard Land Bank please follow this link > What is the Martha's Vineyard Land Bank?

Labels: , , , , , ,

Saturday, October 24, 2009

Martha's Vineyard Condos are getting cheaper, but are they a wise investment?

We all know prices have dropped during the last 4 – 5 years, and in some areas like Las Vegas the roll back has been crushing and as much as 60%. But for most of the country it has averaged 25-35%. On Martha’s Vineyard the roll back has been to 2003 and 2004 prices, or about 15-20%, and in some price lines and Island towns there has been practically no depreciation.

Now that prices are dropping below $400,000 for a ‘habitable’ SFR, condo prices are also going down. As a result, more buyers who want to get a foothold on the Vineyard as home owners are turning to the less expensive condo market. However, there are growing concerns to be aware of when purchasing a condo in this economy and at this time.

All condo communities have associations and association dues that each owner is responsible for on a regular basis. The dues go toward day-to-day maintenance and taxes as well as maintaining a cash reserve for emergencies and major repairs like replacing roofs and siding. Because of the down turn in the economy -- loss of jobs, etc., many condo owners are unable to pay their fair share and that puts the burden on everyone else.

It is important to examine the homeowner’s association by contacting the association board and asking to review the financial documents, which you have a right to do before you close on a condo unit. You also want an inspector to examine the condition of not only the unit you are purchasing but also the common areas that the association is responsible for. You want to find out how dues are paid and what percentage of owners are current on their payments.

According to Leonard Baron, professor of finance at San Diego State University, in an interview for the WSJ, here are some important points to consider when purchasing a condo.

· The condo docs, master deed and financials can be voluminous and the information is tedious to go through, so don’t wait until the last minute to review them and do make sure you get all the documents. Prof. Baron advises that you request to review the condo docs the minute you are in escrow, and request at least three days to review them.

· About two-thirds of any condo association's budget should be operating expenses such as water, lights and landscaping. The remainder should be allocated as a reserve fund for items like roof and siding maintenance and road repair -- any items that are not considered routine and regular maintenance. “See if expenses exceed revenues due to foreclosures, unpaid dues or other reasons. If they do, ask the association what their plans are to make up the shortfall, and whether you should expect an assessment increase or higher dues. Ask also if there are plans to save costs by cutting pool hours, or the number of mowings or clubhouse cleanings. This could affect not only your comfort, but also the future marketability of your home.”

· Find out if a reserve study has been done. This is not required in every state, but it is becoming more common. A reserve study looks at all long-term anticipated maintenance and projected structural replacement items (i.e. roof) over a 30 year period. The costs are tallied and put together onto a payment and maintenance schedule. Your monthly dues should cover the monies that needs to be put away to establish the reserve fund account. Baron says "Many times the boards, under pressure by the owners, will hold the line on raising fees, to the long-term detriment of the property.” He estimates that most associations are only funded 50% or less, and you should have serious concern as to the health of the association if they are funded below 40%. "You could be hit with thousands of dollars in assessments if something expensive fails," he says.

In a number of markets where condo complexes range upwards of fifty to one hundred units, unless the association confirms adequate funding, many banks will not approve a mortgage. I have never been enthusiastic about condos on Martha’s Vineyard; it is not what I consider to be Vineyard lifestyle. Despite what you may think about upkeep on a home verses a condo, on Martha's Vineyard modest single family homes are very easy to take care of, and you own the dirt. Keep it simple; isn’t that why you want to be here?

Labels: , , , ,

Saturday, September 19, 2009

Happy Days Are Here Again, but For Whom?

I take my responsibility as an EXCLUSIVE buyer’s advocate very seriously. I have been saying for many months, now is the time to get into the market, but very few people listened.

The recover in the housing market, not only in Massachusetts, in many parts of the country has occurred faster than we thought it would. My concern is that the market does not understand the new dynamic and that will create discontent and an unreasoned lack of agreement between buyers and sellers.

Now that the summer season has officially ended we are seeing a deluge of properties coming onto the market For those sellers who wanted to spend one more season in their Island homes before they put them on the market, the time has come and that is why we are seeing the appearance of some really nice properties.

And for some who have been suffering the discomfort of their evaporated portfolios, their hope for the kind of seasonal rental income that would support their vacation homes until next summer, that income may not have materialized due to the soft summer rental market, so those properties are now for sale.

For property owners who were smart enough to refrain from cluttering the inventory until the market showed signs of recovery because they were not distressed and did not have to sell; they are being induced to test the waters again. Their reemergence is fueled by a pervasive attitude that the economy appears to be improving, along with statistics to support the fact that the bottom has generally come and gone.

“The percentage of listings with price reductions declined slightly from July to August, and when sellers did slash their asking price they made smaller reductions”, according to a national study by Zip Realty.

In another study done by Zillow.com comparing listing prices to selling prices during July, “U.S. homebuyers paid 3.3 percent less than list price on average, down from 3.5 percent in June and 4.6 percent in January”.

Although we are seeing an apparent rush to market on both sides, the fact is buyers can no longer assume owners with properties for sale are highly motivated, In fact, we have been at the bottom of the market for a while now and the horizon is clearly brighter for sellers than it has been in the last 5 years. I received this email from a local bank the other day:

“Our mortgage staff reports that there are a lot of inquiries, a lot of requests for prequalifications, and applications have begun to pick up…all of this is certainly a good sign that the market is a "happening" place. People are obviously past the point where they are just perusing the real estate guide and trying to figure out just how low they can convince a seller to go…..this rate reduction should be a further spur to deals being made. We all wish you the best of luck this fall…to paraphrase my favorite Irish saying, ‘May the wind always be at your backs from now on!!’"

Here is positive spin demonstrating that the region shows signs of rebound.

The real estate market cannot be rated as a good or a bad market because what is good for one can be bad for another. For the last 3 years it has been considered bad for sellers because no one was buying, yet if a buyer decided to make a purchase, the market was good for them. I think we can all agree the recession has bottomed out and with interest rates still historically low --- under 5%, and with no immediate signs of inflation; this is still an excellent time for buyers to take advantage of once in a lifetime opportunities. But it is also good for sellers. Sellers are no longer feeling as though they are being thrown to the wolves. The market is starting to balance out and sellers are feeling more hopeful and empowered.

In order for you as a buyer to be successful you need to adjust your thinking a little bit and keep your eye on the prize --- a home on Martha’s Vineyard.

1) You are no longer in total control so your expectations of ‘take no prisoners’ will no longer work.

2) You will no longer be able to present a litany of demands to sellers and expect them to acquiesce. You need to be reasonable and willing to leave something on the table --- choose your fights.

3) You have to look at your investment opportunity from the standpoint that the market has gone down anywhere from 10 to as much as 30 percent in some areas and in some price lines. So no matter what, you have to realize you are making a much better purchase than you would have within the last 4-5 years.

4) You have to be willing to negotiate, be patient, be flexible and in the end remember that Martha’s Vineyard is a lifestyle, an emotional decision as well as one of the better long term investments you will make. This Island is a finite commodity and it is not growing any larger.

For buyers today what is most important is to have good representation by a skilled negotiator. Someone who is knowledgeable about the entire market, someone who will thoroughly investigate all details of the property you select so you are fully informed and not surprised later on by things you did not know about. You want someone who will represent you 100% throughout the process and be there for you afterward. You want an exclusive buyer agent. You want SplitRock Real Estate, LLC.

Entering into the home buying process is like wandering through a corn maze, you can make a lot of wrong turns if you are without a knowledgeable guide who knows the way.


Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Saturday, May 23, 2009

Martha's Vineyard Is Now Open For The Season --- Game On!

Our high season has finally arrived with this Memorial Day weekend. Old familiar faces are reappearing in the check-out line at Cronig’s. Young impatient preppy kids with newly minted driver’s licenses driving Daddy’s Mercedes act as if they own the road. Day trippers who have no clue where they are going whiz around precariously on mopeds, and islanders who are no longer able to day dream while behind the wheel of their cars or come and go as they please in pursuit of their daily chores are snapped back into reality, reminded that their space is no longer theirs alone, at least not for the next ten weeks. The Vineyard has awakened like a huge pinball machine once a quarter is inserted. Game on!

I hope it is a wonderful summer for everyone who really loves and appreciates this Island, understands its pace and recognizes that it is one of the only places on earth where you can recharge your physiological battery, redefine your spiritual center, nurture relationships with family and friends, and just “BE”. This is a special place and I love it. Having said that, I am going to go spend time with my wonderful wife, visit with good friends, go fishing, eat some great food and just “BE”.

Labels: , , , ,

Saturday, May 16, 2009

To Fish or Cut Bait, that is the Question….

It’s been a couple of weeks now since I planned a fishing outing with a good friend of mine for this weekend. He came to the Island this morning, and I really wanted to go fishing. Instead, I am working for several buyer clients who are going fishing; they are not sitting on the dock cutting bait. They recognize the time is right and the fish are in; they are getting rigged and ready to catch their prize winner.

Remember a few months ago when the property inventory was up around 800 units? Today the inventory of available SFR, Vacant Land, Condos and Commercial properties in all towns totals 658. There are 17 properties under Purchase and Sale Agreement and 10 Offers to Purchase. This is only a count of those properties updated in our LINK system. I can assure you there are more properties under negotiation and it is not uncommon to have multiple offers and bidding wars on the nicer properties.

To a great extent, the public opinion about the depressed state of the real estate market is based upon other parts of the country that are not as special as Martha’s Vineyard, not even close. But did you know property sales in some of those depressed real estate market areas are up? According to an article in this week’s WSJ, some of the states with big sales increases from the depressed levels of a year before included Nevada (up 117%), California (up 81%) and Arizona (up 50%) and Florida (up 25%).

Here on Martha’s Vineyard, prices are down, Sellers are ready to deal, FHA guidelines are easier and first time home buyers who qualify are taking advantage of the remarkable $8000 tax credit opportunity that will sunset at the end of this year.

I’ve got to get back to rigging fishing tackle for my clients, but I tell you if you want to catch one of those big ones you have got to get your line in the water very soon. Cast away or sail away. This is your time, so please, don’t miss the season.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Saturday, April 25, 2009

Is it Time To Go Real Estate Shopping on Martha's Vineyard?

During the last week I have been talking to other real estate agents and professionals in ancillary services about their market observations and workloads. The general consensus is clear; the Vineyard real estate market is rounding the corner, at least in the lower to mid-range.

Personally, I am seeing a lot more serious interest from consumers and clients. When I go to property showings with a client, the seller agents we meet say the same words right up front. “The seller is very motivated”. Normally, I think that is a silly thing to say because why else would anyone put their property on the market, and especially in a market like this. However, the truth is they are more than motivated; they are nervous as hell, and this is when deals are made.

I was looking at ‘Off Market’ low-end properties removed from the inventory around the first of the year and there really isn’t anything worth talking about that is not back on the market today. What is for sale is on the market and even though it may not be priced right, the sellers are ready to listen and work something out with buyers who are willing to put an offer on the table. The property inventory is saturated, rentals are soft and interest rates remain low. I think this is a perfect time to get into the market and see if you can get that dream home you have been wanting at a price that makes sense to you.

Labels: , , , ,

Thursday, March 05, 2009

President Obama’s NEW Housing-Aid Plan – who WINS and who LOSES?

The new Housing-Aid Plan, according to the administration, is estimated to cover as many as nine million mortgage holders nationwide. It has two main components.

PART 1: Loan Modification
The first part supports borrowers who have kept up with their mortgage payments, but have lost so much value in their homes that they don’t have the equity necessary to refinance. Therefore, they are unable to take advantage of the present record low interest rates, which are hovering around 4%.

You WIN if you have payments of more than 31% of your pretax monthly income and you can prove hardship.

You WIN if you occupy a single-family home and can prove the home is your primary residence.

You WIN if you have an unpaid principal balance of $729,750 or less.

You WIN if you have a mortgage originated on or before January 1, 2009 and make all the modified payments over a trial period of three months or more.

You LOSE if you are not about to default.

You LOSE if you are an investor with a home that is not owner-occupied.

You LOSE if you have a home that is vacant of condemned.

You LOSE if you have an unpaid principal of more than $729,750.

You LOSE if your mortgage is packaged into securities whose rules explicitly forbid modification.

You LOSE if you have loan servicers who can’t be reached or are unwilling to consider modification.

PART 2: Loan Refinancing
The second part of the plan is geared toward borrowers who are already delinquent in their loan payments or are in eminent danger of default and aren’t able to refinance, perhaps due to a decrease in the value of their home.

You WIN if you have loans owned or guaranteed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.

You WIN if you are current on your mortgage payments.

You WIN if you can prove the ability to afford the new mortgage debt.

You WIN if your mortgage balance is no more than 105% of your current estimated home value.

You LOSE if you have loans owned or guaranteed by a company other than Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.

You LOSE if you have been more than 30 days late on a payment in the past 12 months.

You LOSE if you can’t afford the new mortgage debt.

You LOSE if your home price has fallen so that the loan is more than 105% of the market price.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Tuesday, February 24, 2009

Good Property Opportunities on Martha's Vineyard

BANK OWNED PROPERTY (REO): This property was officially listed for resale by the lender on January 26, 2008 at an asking price of $564,900. The price was just reduced to $555,000, and the current town assessment is $697,100. The fact that the price has been reduced is standard procedure for a lender after 30 days without substantial interest in the property. This is a good sign for prospective buyers. The property is located in a nice neighborhood equidistant to all down-Island towns and is a lot of house for the money.

Click here to view property > Edgartown - 6 Mockingbird Drive

Labels: , , , , , ,

Friday, February 20, 2009

Everything is Coming Up Roses, Or Are They Tea Bags?

Rick Santelli was reporting from the pit at the Chicago stock exchange the other day and got everyone stirred up with his suggestion of a Chicago Tea Party . I thought it was marvelous and right on.

Here we are now with a $787 billion stimulus package that includes anemic elements like an $8000.00 tax credit for taxpayers buying a primary residence between Jan. 1 and Dec. 1, 2009. Single taxpayers making less than $75,000 are eligible. That tax credit doubles for married couples. Think about it, an 8k credit is just a drop in the bucket for a buyer in areas like Martha’s Vineyard, and no not everyone who lives here is rich. It’s just not enough. And what about the $75 billion mortgage relief plan the President announced. It’s not right. The Wall Street Journal says, "By investing in failure, the Administration will also prolong the housing downturn and make financing a home purchase more difficult for future borrowers." The New York Times says it is "a good start, but given the dire state of the economy, we fear it still may not be enough."

But what is enough and actually too much is the idea that people who did nothing wrong, the 92 percentile, are being asked to help the 8% that either had no business getting a loan in the first place or defrauded the banks intentionally out of sheer avarice. It’s the hard working people who are continuing to pay their bills even though they are suffering like everyone else today; they are really going to suffer.

Here’s a quick story I heard yesterday from a broker in Florida about one of those people you will be suffering for. This ‘investor’ accumulated no less than 20 properties through no-money down financing during the high time of the market. They did not and have not paid one cent toward an equity share on those properties; they had every intention of not owning the properties long term. The lenders began the foreclosure process about three years ago, but it takes time. In the meantime, this person is consistently making about $20,000 a month in rental income. There are hundreds of scenarios like this one. Why should we suffer for this kind of behavior? They should lose everything and go to jail. But if they go to jail, shouldn’t the enablers go with them? Yes, and that is why nothing will happen to them.

If you are wondering why the foreclosure machine is moving so slowly, let me give you a brief idea by way of another true story. This person is a first time home buyer who will most likely lose their home when their Alt-A loan resets. Mind you this is also in one of the areas where values have dropped by 50%. This person went through foreclosure prevention counseling and as instructed began the bureaucratic procedure with the lender for a loan modification. They spoke to a loss mitigation representative and complied with the instructions they were given. They supplied all the necessary documentation, both on line and via certified mail. They had the person’s name and extension number, but when they called to get a progress report after about two weeks, that person did not exist and both their cyber and paper trail no longer existed. They tried again filling out all the same information, etc. Again after a couple of weeks they contacted the LM department and that person did not exist. However, somehow they were finally able to track down the person that helped them. The representative told them, “You can jump up and down, get nasty and impatient but it will not do you any good. I have over 100 case files on my desk and you are just one of them in the pile. You’ll hear from us when we get to your case.” End of discussion. That’s just one person who has to deal with this enormous mess the government wants everyone to be responsible for.

Bringing it back home to the Cape and Martha’s Vineyard, here in Massachusetts the Warren Group reported the number of homes on Cape Cod that were actually foreclosed on last month was down 8.9 percent. This number is compared to January 2008. In exact numbers, there were 41 foreclosure deeds filed in January 2009 compared to 45 last year. In Dukes County, which is Martha’s Vineyard, the number of foreclosure deeds filed fell to 9 last month compared to 13 in January 2008. That is a difference of 30.8 percent. The experts are not sure what is causing this reduction in foreclosures, but it is a good sign as are the more realistic price reductions posted by the Martha’s Vineyard Information Network database. There are 467 single family homes currently on the market with a total inventory of 680 properties in all classifications. There are 72 single family homes that have been removed from the market since the first of the year. I can assure you everything is for sale, so if you want one of those properties just ask.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Sunday, February 15, 2009

Good Property Opportunities on Martha's Vineyard

SHORT SALE: Located close to the hospital and 5 minutes from either Vineyard Haven or Oak Bluffs Harbor, this 2100 sf colonial style 3 bedroom 2.5 bath home on a quarter acre lot is being offered at the distress price of $450,000. The assessed value for 2009 is $576, 700 and it was purchased in 2006 for $612,000. Please note that this property may very well sell for more than the asking price and offer acceptance is subject to approval by the lender.

Click here to view property > Oak Bluffs - 3 Linton Avenue

Labels: , , , , , ,

Friday, February 13, 2009

Agency Disclosure Follow-up for Buyers Only on Martha’s Vineyard

In my recent Blog titled “For Buyers Only on Martha’s Vineyard” I spoke about Agency Disclosure. I want to revisit the subject and add some statistical numbers tabulated by the National Association of REALTORS® (NAR).

Making the decision to be an Exclusive Buyer Agent is one that many real estate practitioners feel limits their potential for maximum income, because you can only walk on one side of the street --- the BUYER’s side. There is no double dipping or switching hats to suit the occasion. Exclusive Buyer Agents have to have a passion for protecting the buying public.

According to a recent essay published in NAEBAhood News written by John Sullivan of Buyer’s Edge in Bethesda, MD, “The abrogation of the common law of agency promulgated by NAR and instituted individually by state legislatures throughout the country … resulted in eliminating the fiduciary duties of obedience, loyalty, confidentiality, and reasonable care.” On my website, I painstakingly put together information outlining the differences and explaining what are the duties of a Fiduciary to a Principal/Client?

Sadly, I have personally witnessed buyer confusion as a result of the foreclosures we are experiencing here on Martha’s Vineyard. A distressed home owner told me the other day that he blamed his agent and the lender for giving him a loan they had no business approving. He will most likely lose his home because he will not be allowed to work it out since he still has no documentation to verify his income. Lenders have much stricter requirements today, as they should have had all along, and those requirements seem to be changing on a daily basis. Sure, the buyer should have known better (caveat emptor), but when he had three so-called professionals who he believed were on his side, he trusted that he was doing the right thing. In most cases, the real estate agents, mortgage brokers and even the attorneys that participated in the purchase sale transactions had no compunction about what they were doing, even though in their hearts they knew it was unlikely the buyer could fulfill their obligation according to the terms of the loan(s).

Much of the confusion comes from the fact that consumers are not informed of the real estate agent’s role in the transaction. According to NAR’s own study, only 30% of homebuyers were presented with the Mandatory Agency Disclosure Form at the first face-to-face meeting to discuss a specific property. Only 28% received the disclosure form when the purchase contract was written, and 22% never received it at all. 20% of the homebuyers could not even remember a discussion about the fiduciary responsibility of the agent or the options available to them. First time homebuyers were the most neglected with only 23% receiving the agency disclosure at the first meeting to discuss property. Those numbers are pathetic. No wonder consumers don’t trust real estate agents.

Massachusetts implemented their Mandatory Agency Disclosure in 2005, but I believe the state has done very little to enforce the law or properly educate consumers, or practitioners.

NAR’s only option for what they call Exclusive Buyer Agency provides a mechanism stated as “with consent to dual agency”. To me that is an oxymoron and the word “Exclusive” should be removed from the NAR Right To Represent Buyer Agreement. Here is the wording some brokers are using. See if it makes you, as a consumer, comfortable and confident that you will receive the maximum care and guidance you want.

Consent to Dual Agency. The BUYER understands that BROKER also represents seller and that if BROKER shows BUYER a property listed by a seller-client a “dual agency” will be created. The BROKER may act as a dual agent who represents both prospective BUYER and SELLER with their informed written consent. A dual agent is authorized to assist the BUYER and SELLER in a transaction, but shall be neutral with regard to any conflicting interest of the BUYER and SELLER. Consequently, a dual agent will not have the ability to satisfy fully the duties of loyalty, full disclosure, reasonable care and obedience to lawful instruction, but shall still owe the duty of confidentiality of material information and the duty to account for funds. The BUYER understands that material information received from either client that is confidential may not be disclosed by a dual agent, except: (1) if disclosure is expressly authorized; (2) if such disclosure is required by law; (3) if such disclosure is intended to prevent illegal conduct; or (4) if such disclosure is necessary to prosecute a claim against a person represented or to defend a claim against the broker or salesperson. This duty of confidentiality shall continue after termination of the brokerage relationship. By signing the agreement, BUYER authorizes BROKER to act as a dual agent and consents to dual agency. If dual agency occurs in a transaction, a notice of dual agency will be given.

Exclusive Buyer Agency is a commitment members of the National Association of Exclusive Buyer Agents (NAEBA) make to consumers. This is a black and white cut and dry commitment; there are no gray areas and it takes passion and dedication to subscribe to this business model. For 100% representation 100% of the time, insist upon working with an Exclusive Buyer Agent when you are purchasing real estate of any kind.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Thursday, February 12, 2009

Good Property Opportunities on Martha's Vineyard

There are two properties that I want to bring to your attention. I know they are on opposite ends of the price spectrum but they are both worthy of comment.

The first one is a simple extended Cape that has just been reduced in price to $495,000. The 2009 assessment is 533K.

Click here to view property >
Vineyard Haven - 81 Hazelwood Avenue

The second property is an architect designed contemporary in the West Chop area. This is in my opinion a beautifully designed home with a very good address.

Click here to view property > Vineyard Haven - 97 Golf Club Road

Labels: , , , , ,

Sunday, February 08, 2009

For Buyers Only on Martha’s Vineyard

In an article titled ‘AGENCY, Know Your Facts’ published in the January 2009 Newsletter by the Cape Cod & Islands Association of Realtors®, Inc the following points were made under the topic heading “ The Law”. There were many other facts discussed, but I thought these two would be of particular interest to consumers.

  • Designated Agency is a process where the broker of record, with the consent of the consumer, designates one or more agents to represent a Seller and designates one or more agents to represent a Buyer in the same transaction. The relationship with the consumer begins and ends with the designated agent and does not extend to the other agents in the office. In a designated agency firm, the broker is a dual agent and retains all legal and ethical responsibility for the transaction.”

Although there is a definition of Designated Agency on the Mandatory Disclosure form, I do not discuss it as part of my consumer education process because traditional real estate agencies on Martha’s Vineyard only practice Disclosed Dual Agency. The concept of Dual Agency in itself is difficult enough for consumers to wrap their minds around. I have a lot of information on agency representation on my website FOR BUYERS ONLY.

The main reason Designated Agency is not a consumer service offered on Martha’s Vineyard is because the offices are not large enough, and because the principal brokers realize this is much to frothy a concept for them to handle comfortably. But come on folks, read the definition again and see if it does not totally blow your mind. We all know that business is primarily all about the money, and with guidelines like these and human nature such as it is --- I mean really!

The next topic discussed in the newsletter was Agency Disclosure.

  • “The Agency Disclosure requirement stipulates that at the first personal meeting to discuss a specific property, prospective Buyers and Sellers be notified of the agency relationship using the state disclosure form, which must be signed by the Buyer or Seller and retained on record by the broker for a minimum of three years.”

In Massachusetts, as stated above, the Agency Disclosure form is a Mandatory requirement. It is not a contract and therefore does not bind the consumer in any way to the agent they are working with. It is an effort to avoid misunderstanding and litigation by providing full disclosure. However, many agents do not present the Agency Disclosure form to the consumer at all. Perhaps they are fearful it will be off-putting or, in reality, it is because they themselves do not understand it and don’t realize it is the law. Also, many agents present the mandatory disclosure to consumers with the implied assumption that it binds the consumer to them as a ‘client’. This misrepresentation and use of the Agency Disclosure form is critical to any relationship actual or implied.

When an agent presents a mandatory agency disclosure form to a Seller and the agent selects that he/she represents a Seller, you can rest assured it is because that Seller has entered into a contractual relationship with the agent who is now the Seller’s fiduciary. The agent has an ‘Exclusive Listing Agreement’ with the Seller. If the agent selects that he/she represents the Buyer, legally that agent can only do so with written authorization and consideration from the Buyer. These are the elements that define a contract (“An agreement with specific terms between two or more persons or entities in which there is a promise to do something in return for a valuable benefit known as consideration”).

Establishing Buyer Representation must be a two-pronged conversation. “Mr and Mrs Buyer, I am required by law to present you with this Agency Disclosure form mandated by Massachusetts Law, which I must ask you to sign before we can discuss any properties you are interested in. I want to be your Exclusive Buyer Agent, but unless we also execute an Exclusive Right To Represent Agreement, I will not be able to advocate in your best interests as your fiduciary.”

If a written contract is not executed establishing a fiduciary relationship with a Buyer, the agent is actually a Facilitator and represents neither the Buyer nor the Seller. Just remember that the Seller will have 100% representation and you the Buyer can also have 100% representation, but only if you enter into an Exclusive Right To Represent Agreement without consent to Dual Agency.

Labels: , , , , ,

Saturday, February 07, 2009

Another Huge Opportunity for Home Buyers

As part of the new Economic Stimulus Bill being thrashed around in the senate, and on top of the Tax Credit proposed for all home buyers allowing them a tax credit at the rate of 10% of the sales price up to a limit of $15,000, there now is Amendment 353.

Amendment 353, proposed by Senator John Ensign, Republican Senator from Nevada, would provide 30 year fixed rate financing at about 4%, for anyone purchasing a primary residence. If this passes the House and if there is more sensitivity by lenders in handling those threatened by foreclosure, we could really be on our way to recovery in the housing market.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Thursday, February 05, 2009

You Want a Great Deal, But Do You Really Want a Foreclosure?

Foreclosures represent a mammoth portion of today’s housing inventory. In RealtyTrac’s recently released 2008 Foreclosure Market Report, they showed a total of 3,157,806 foreclosure filings. The number of default notices, auction sale notices and bank repossessions reached 2,330,483 properties.

Up until now most people were of the opinion they could save huge sums of money buying a foreclosure property. However, more people are shying away from that process, and if they are willing to engage at all, they are demanding steep discounts averaging 25% from the listing price, and many are expecting to pay 50% less than for a non-foreclosed home. According to a recent Moody's Economy.com report, since the peak of the market several years ago home prices fell in 70% of all metro areas. Although the decline in most metro areas was modest, prices did decline by 5% in 116 metro areas and more than 20% in about 50 metro areas. In the most depressed markets, a buyer insisting upon a 25% discount doesn’t seem like that much for a distressed property. But this all depends upon how realistic the listing price is.

Banks are still requiring BPO’s as part of their preparation for marketing foreclosures, but the problem with that approach is they are looking back at the market for values, and in declining markets they need to look forward when pricing properties. The result in most cases is banks overestimate the listing price. All they know is what they are owed and that is all they care about. So what happens is properties sit on the market for long periods of time suffering from accelerated deterioration or vandalism. Someone will have to pay for the repairs and the bank does not want to assume any responsibility.

In December, Trulia and RealtyTrac published a survey indicating that in the seven months prior to the study the number of people interested in foreclosures dropped by seven percent to 47%. The first study reported in April 2008 by these market tracking companies recorded 69% of the buyers polled had a negative opinion of foreclosures. Since then the number has risen to 80%. On Martha’s Vineyard there are very few foreclosures and I continue to maintain that buyers can do better negotiating on a non-foreclosure property.

Labels: , , , ,

Senate Moves to Expand Tax Credit as High as $15,000

This could be an excellent incentive for some home buyers on Martha’s Vineyard who can qualify. Currently, the maximum tax credit is $7500 and that is only for first time home buyers, but if this new amendment approved by the Democratic Senate passes the House and goes into effect, buyers who are purchasing a home as their primary residence, regardless of whether they are first time buyers or not, will receive a $15000 tax credit or 10% of the home purchase price, depending upon whichever is less. The tax credit will be in effect for one year.

Labels: , , , ,

Wednesday, January 28, 2009

All Real Estate Is Local?

The National Association of Realtors has been working diligently through national ads for several years to educate consumers that all real estate is local. They don’t think what is happening in one area of the country is happening everywhere. I absolutely agree but it is like second hand smoke, everyone is affected to one degree or another.

With the ever deepening economic crisis crawling into every aspect of our lives and the reality that this is a global crisis of unprecedented proportion, I would rephrase the slogan and say all real estate is the same, but different.

I was reading an article about the effects of what is now an epidemic real estate crisis in the UK, effecting one of the wealthiest resort areas in the world. Fortunes have been lost and high rollers living in $7,000,000 homes are now living in apartments above retail shops. Playgrounds around the world are all affected by the hubris that brought the market down, from Hollywood to Dubai and Monte Carlo.

I am going to paraphrase part of a commentary that expresses a sentiment that rang a bell for me with regard to Martha’s Vineyard. However, it was written about a seaside luxury resort area in the UK. I will leave out the location specific parts so you can fill in the blanks.

“I’M not surprised the credit crunch has hit (blank). … Why should it be immune?”

“(Blank) is a very, very beautiful place. If prices coming down makes it more accessible to ordinary people, that is a good thing.”

“Locals were becoming very concerned about the way the place was changing.”

“(Blank) is a quintessentially English place and should remain so.”

“Prices … were way too high. The fact they are coming down is good.”

“It makes (blank) more affordable and attracts the right kind of person for the area.”

“Hopefully more local people will be able to afford to move there and it will remain as beautiful as it is.”

All those who feel this way about Martha’s Vineyard raise your hands.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Saturday, January 17, 2009

Martha's Vineyard Real Estate --Then and Now

I was thinking about how this recession compares to the last one. The unemployment rate in Massachusetts was 9% in the early 90’s, and today it is about 6%. We also had about three times as many properties on the market here on the Vineyard.

If you are sitting on the fence, knowing in your heart that this is your chance of a lifetime to own property here but reluctant to get into the game because you think the market will go down more, you may be right. But you may regret it. If this is really your dream, do yourself a favor. Calculate exactly what your savings would be if you bought that perfect property you’ve been watching now, versus perhaps waiting until the market drops another point and you have to settle for something else. We all know the old saying, 'don't let life pass you by'.

Labels: , , ,

Friday, November 21, 2008

REO’s: A Cautionary on Bank Own Property Purchases

Properties that have been repossessed through foreclosure by a lender are called REO’s. REO stands for Real Estate Owned. If they are bank owned, why not call them BO’s? I suppose it is obvious why not, although many of them stink. When buying REO properties there are some key differences to understand, as opposed to a traditional real estate purchase. First and foremost, you as a buyer have little or no ability to negotiate the price or terms with the seller. REO properties are sold “AS IS” and the seller is a financial institution with no emotional attachment to the property for sale. Unlike a traditional homeowner, they do not have any personal interest in who is moving into “their home”. There is a good chance that no one from the bank has seen the property, or been inside the house. The same holds true for the listing broker if that listing broker is not local. The lender is only concerned with receiving the highest Offer and best terms possible to suit themselves. Most of the negotiation process is completed via internet e-mail. The only information the bank will receive is the terms of the Offer. They only care about how much you will pay for the property, and how you will pay for the property.

Be sure you speak with your lender before submitting an offer on an REO property. In most cases, a pre-approval letter, not a pre-qualification letter, is required simultaneously with the Offer to Purchase. The bank wants to be certain they are considering an Offer from a buyer that has the credit and financial wherewithal to see the deal through. In many cases the seller even wants to see a bank statement showing you have enough cash in your account to consummate the transaction. Isn’t that an invasion of privacy?

Since you can’t rely on personal interaction with the seller, the cleaner the Offer the better it will look. Because REO properties are sold in “As-Is” condition, you want to look for a loan program that applies to this type of property. The condition of the property may not qualify you for certain types of traditional loans. If the property is in poor condition, and most REO’s are in poor condition, you might want to investigate a construction loan. Many lenders are now offering programs geared specifically for distressed properties. This way, the repairs can be completed after the buyer takes possession of the property. If your Offer is accepted, you are entitled to have your own property Structural Inspection, but you will only have a few days to complete the inspection. Quite often, only a dry inspection will be possible. By that I mean the power and water will not be turned on. Some REO clearing houses will advance funds and take responsibility for ‘trashing out’ the property and generally cleaning it up, because it helps them market the property. However, that is being done less and less today because listing companies are finding it very difficult to get reimbursed for their expenses. It’s getting ugly, and it may get worse before it gets better.

What about the closing date? Yes, that is also handled differently from the way a traditional purchase is closed. In a traditional sale, it is possible for the seller to be flexible about a closing date. Some contracts use the term “on or about” a certain date. Sellers in a traditional sale tend to be more willing to adjust plus or minus to make the sale work, as long as the Closing takes place within a reasonable number of days from the original date agreed upon. However, REO contracts use the term “on or before” a certain date, and the bank will tell you what the closing date will be. The bank will expect the Closing to take place no later than their stipulated closing date, and if there is a delay on the buyer’s side causing the buyer to be in default, the bank will either terminate the contract, with the buyer forfeiting their down payment, or the buyer will be penalized a specified dollar amount per day for an extension. Most often that amount is $100.00 per day. However, because of the enormous inventory of bank owned properties today, in my experience sales often do not close on time and the bank is responsible for the delay. A 30-day closing can end up being a 120-day closing, and that could mean the buyer will lose their loan rate lock. Nevertheless, I cannot stress strongly enough that the bank sets the timelines and they could care less about what you want.

Because REO transactions are different from traditional purchases, any buyer interested in an REO property needs a knowledgeable support team consisting of a competent and vigilant real estate buyer agent who knows how to look out for their buyer client’s best interest and can interface fluidly with a good attorney. Yes, the next member of the team needs to be a GOOD ATTORNEY, one who will take the necessary care to investigate the property title. What you do not need is a wishy-washy, don’t ask, don’t tell real estate agent and attorney, who just wants to get it done, collect a fee and move on.

REO properties appear to be very attractive opportunities on the surface, and you can save money purchasing an REO property. However, you can also end up spending considerably more money than you would on a traditional purchase property, not to mention all the stress and anxiety that has become typical with this type of transaction. Many times the offering price is set low in order to attract buyer attention with the hope that multiple buyers bidding on the same property will drive up the final price. Buyers are encouraged to submit their highest and best offer without the opportunity to know what the highest price is that they are bidding against. Since these properties are being sold “AS IS”, and since the onus is usually on the buyer to correct any structural deficiencies in the property, repairs can drive the final price above the realm of what would be considered a good deal. With short sales, foreclosures, and REO’s there are no guarantees, and in Massachusetts, it’s Caveat Emptor. That is why you need to hire an Exclusive Buyer Agent who deals with buyers’ needs day in and day out. On Martha’s Vineyard you want SplitRock Real Estate, an exclusive buyer agency specializing in careful buyer representation.

Labels: , ,

Wednesday, October 08, 2008

WHAT’S “WRONG” WITH THE MARTHA’S VINEYARD REAL ESTATE MARKET

Starting with the premise that commerce is activated by supply and demand, I want to look at what is wrong with the Martha’s Vineyard real estate market today. What I discovered was that, in fact, there is nothing wrong with the Martha’s Vineyard real estate market; it is just that this market is confusing to many people and even more confusing today given the dire conditions in the financial market and a disparity in seller motivation factors. But first let me establish a few facts as guidelines:
<> This is not a place people have to be, they want to be here. Martha’s Vineyard is a destination and for the most part, a second home market.
<> This Island is only 20.5 miles long, 87.48 square miles in total land area --- they are not making any more of Martha’s Vineyard.
<> With home prices averaging almost 100% higher than the national average, ranging from $300,000 for a shabby ‘fixer-upper’ to $25,000,000 and above not everyone can afford to swallow that pill.
<> The cost of living is about 60% above the mean, so once again living here is surely not for everyone, but that does not diminish its popularity.
<> There are between 775 and 850 properties on the market, depending upon the method of tabulation used, which is about four times as many properties as there were at the height of the market.
<> The current inventory is about one-quarter of what we had to deal with after the market broke in 1988, and the population density has increased significantly since 1990.

The total inventory at the time of this writing totals 777 properties. I want to break down that number, which includes all classifications of properties so you have a better perspective:
<> Up to $200,000 = 7 properties (Note: This includes a share in a fishing camp, an aircraft hanger, time shares and an office condo.)
<> $201,000 - $400,000 = 86 properties
<> $401,000 - $600,000 = 162 properties
<> $601,000 - $800,000 = 140 properties
<> $801,000 - $1,000,000 = 85 properties
<> $1,100,000 - $2,000,000 = 157 properties
<> $2,100,000 - $3,000,000 = 51 properties
<> $3,100,000 - $5,000,000 = 54 properties
<> $5,100,000 – $30,000,000 = 35 properties

Only 18% of the inventory is above $2,000,000. That means the so-called lower end of the market is where the fat is. However, within that segment lies a misleading inflationary factor --- sellers who do not have to sell.

For a few years now we have been reading about how the real estate market has tanked in some areas of the country, falling into what many view as a fathomless abyss. The media has us believing this was the general condition everywhere. In an attempt to educate consumers, the National Association of Realtors® launched an educational campaign proclaiming ‘all real estate is local’. This is true, all real estate is local and in many parts of the country the market has been pretty much stable or a recovery is under way. But the message came too late, the die was cast, and for most of the country sales activity started to stall. Sellers started to panic and buyers delighted that the tide was turning in their favor. No longer would the buyers be at the mercy of a seller’s market. Even on Martha’s Vineyard buyers believed they finally had a chance to get a foothold on their dream Island.

Overall, however, property values still remain solid on Martha’s Vineyard. Yes, I am serious. If you are interested in real estate on Martha’s Vineyard, you should be paying attention to this local market and not be influenced by broad brush studies that are based on limited national metropolitan samplings. I don’t deny there are pockets across the country where prices have fallen 40% or more. These areas are not the norm. On Martha’s Vineyard, overall, the price drop has only gone down about 14% since 2006. For anyone who invested in Martha’s Vineyard real estate 5, 10, or 20 years ago, the good news is their investment has increased handsomely in value over that time period, even with the occasional bumps in the economic highway.

Exclusive Buyer Agents, such as SplitRock Real Estate, work very hard to educate consumers and create Power Buyers. I have a number of buyer/clients who have been working with me for 6 months, a year, even three years or more. They have a sincere desire to be here if they can only find the right property at the right price (Isn’t that typical of what motivates buying decisions?). Much to their chagrin they are discovering that prices on the Vineyard make no sense. Comparables are difficult to come up with, and ultimately the buying decision has to be an emotional decision. For those who are thinking long term and understand the fundamentals of real estate investment, the fact that prices overall have not gone down much should be a reassuring factor that lends more confidence to a buying decision. For others, if they cannot afford to make the investment now they will regrettably join the ranks of the would-have, should-have, could-have buyers.

So what is wrong with the Martha’s Vineyard real estate market? Buyers who enter the Martha’s Vineyard real estate market, regardless of whether it is an up or a down market are confused and scared. They do not want to make a mistake or appear foolish. There are many sellers who are sincerely motivated and will actively compete, engage and negotiate with buyers to sell their properties in this market. I am not including what we call distress sales, i.e. short sales, foreclosures and bank owned properties (aka REO’s). The problem lies with the ‘ego seller’ who lists their property for sale, but really does not care if they sell now or two years from now. They are not willing to listen to the market (IE their seller agents), and insist on holding a hard line because they think their properties are special, and their posture is "I don't have to sell". I call this the ‘goose that laid the golden egg’ mentality. Sellers who are not competitive are like buyers who are not qualified; they are wasting everyone’s time and money. If you are a serious seller, please don’t be offended by an offer you receive. Be willing to graciously engage with a meaningful counter offer. Properly educating buyers is a difficult, time-consuming process. When they get to a point where they are comfortable making a reasonable offer, if they are coldly rejected by a seller, it sets the whole process back considerably. If you recall the moral of Aesop’s fable, he who wants too much loses everything. In this case it is the entire Vineyard real estate market that is losing.

As average buyers watch the market week after week, the inventory continues to grow. Some buyers hold out, sitting on the sidelines, as they keep hoping those overpriced properties will come down in price. They resist making a buying decision waiting for sellers to cave in. The result is a slow market with minimal inventory absorption. When the inventory was limited, the demand was greater and the market moved briskly. If this market is going to get back in stride, it is my opinion that sellers, who don’t need to sell, should remove their properties from the current inventory. If sellers don’t like where the market is today and they are not willing to be competitive and engage in negotiations, they should wait and relist their properties when happy days are here again. And surely, this too shall pass and happy days will return.




Labels: , , , , , ,

Thursday, August 14, 2008

Is the Martha’s Vineyard Housing Market really that Bad? I Don’t Think So

Looking at the overall picture of the housing crisis, perspective and understanding has been lost as a result of what is essentially a localized crisis in 4 states: California, Nevada, Florida, and Arizona. According to statistics from City-Data.com, 54 of the 101 cities with the largest population increase from 2000 - 2006 are located inside California, Nevada, Florida, and Arizona - the four states most affected by sharply decreasing home values. These four states saw the largest population influx between 2000 and 2006 triggering the need for more housing supply and with that demand, prices started to go up at 15% or more annually.

Anyone who has been in the real estate investment business knows that what goes up must come down. Many mortgage lenders bolstered by the above average appreciation rate year after year irresponsibly let their guard down, lowering lending standards and granting all sorts of exotic loans they should have known could not be repaid. Opportunity and greed propelled builders, real estate licensees, lenders and investors to push the envelope until the bubble burst. Today there are 15 states struggling to correct themselves; that is 30% of the country with 37% of the population and approximately 4 million problem mortgages. That breaks down to 7 percent of all mortgages owned in the U.S. Sure, you hear numbers reported by RealtyTrac, a foreclosure reporting service, stating one in every 464 U.S. households were served with a foreclosure filing in July --- 272,171 households, but the deepest concentration of those foreclosures are in California, Nevada, Florida, and Arizona. In Cape Coral-Fort Meyers, Florida alone, one in every 64 households received a foreclosure notice in July. On Martha’s Vineyard, RealtyTrac is reporting only 34 properties in Pre-foreclosure, Foreclosure or REO status. There are approximately 14,000 households on Martha’s Vineyard. The current inventory of properties for sale is less than 800 properties. Does anyone remember the early nineties? This is nothing compared to back then, but business is so much more difficult today because everyone is afraid of doing the wrong thing. Most of the public continues to believe the media, and the media continues to fuel the fear factor because, “misery sells newspapers”.

Not having a clear picture of the market has resulted in a lack of movement stalling the market, except for those buyers who ignore the media negativity and know how to read the numbers. I believe we are about to see a significant paradigm shift being expressed in two ways. Frustrated sellers are finally taking a hard look at their pricing realizing that their past strategy has not worked and has done them more harm than good. They are listening to their seller agents and cutting prices to the bone, well below assessed value in many cases. Sellers who have refused to price their properties realistically for today’s market and were never really sincere about selling, are taking their properties off the market. They think the market is about to turn around and prices will start to inch back up within the next 4 to 9 months. They can wait. I think this will paint a clear uncluttered picture for consumers who have been anxiously waiting with pent-up desire to get into this market but have been unsure and confused. They will finally realize now is the time to buy. They want to buy!

This fall, mortgage rates are forecasted to go up as much as a quarter percentage point according to Jim Vogel, an analyst at FTN Financial Capital Markets. This prediction is a result of Fannie Mae reporting a second-quarter loss of $2.3 billion and their prediction of more heavy losses resulting from the home-mortgage defaults and price declines centered primarily in California
(-28%), Florida (-17%), Nevada and Arizona. Fannie Mae has already said they will stop buying alt-A loans by the end of 2008. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are going to be limited in their ability to buy and guarantee home loans, and they will increase fees to borrowers seeking LTVs of 75-80 percent. Increases in the cost of borrowing will reduce the pool of homebuyers with the expected result that buyers with strong liquidity and solid credit will be in the catbird seat. As of today, mortgage rates are still very attractive. Martha’s Vineyard local Island banks understand our market and are excellent at helping qualified buyers to create a loan package that suits their needs. Now is the best time to buy, waiting will only create memories of what could have been your dream come true.

Labels: , , , , ,